Gale Windhawk Luxury Sub-Guide by Sophie/Joan: Difference between revisions

Gale Windhawk Luxury Sub-Guide by Sophie/Joan (view source)

636 bytes added , 3 days ago

1,638

edits

@@ Line 762: / Line 762: @@
 |
 <small>
-*{{#item:300530}} (BiS)
+*{{#item:300530}} (old BiS)
-*{{#item:4676}} (old BiS, becoming somehow relevant again for the critical bonus)
+*{{#item:300473}} (Experimental)
-*{{#item:300261}} (If you somehow left only with this choice, the critical bonus is not bad even if you don't claim the 30% '''critical%''' bonus from the 125 LUK)
+*{{#item:4676}} (old BiS)
+*{{#item:300426}}
+*{{#item:300517}}(Combo with '''Yoscopus Sorcerer Card''' or '''Yoscopus Guardian Card''')
+*or any other cheap Bio5 MVP card e.g. {{#item:4677}}
 </small>
@@ Line 770: / Line 773: @@
 *Enchanted with {{#item:313023}}, {{#item:312538}}, and {{#item:312479}}.
+*The reason any Bio5 MVP card works is because it is only a difference of CRI +20 (we don't really care about Bio5 Shecil card's 15% ranged physical damage bonus) and is easily solved by {{#item:14536}}
-*Use {{#item:14536}} to get above the critical magic number
+*Also use {{#item:14536}} when using {{#item:300517}} or {{#item:300473}}
+*<11 April 2026> BiS MVP card for garment is still unlisted because I don't know yet which one is better (I'm unable to do the needed test as of <11 April 2026>. The theoretical reason is that we are no longer be using {{#item:470260}} or {{#item:470303}} which synchronized well with {{#item:300530}} on the critical and crit% numbers, beside the existence of {{#item:300610}} which crit bonus could saturates bonus from {{#item:300530}}.
 |- style=height:16em